Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

R.M. COURT.

M A STERTON.—FRIDAY. ' . (Before Colonel liolorts, 11.M.) V FOUE CHIMNEY. . ' [/■'.[.' J.H. La Boche . was fined 5b and costs 2s . for allowing a ohimney to catch fire. • UNREGISTERED DOG 9,' Inspector Ingram v B. Bontley. Withdrawn on the application of informant, defendant' having since registered his dog and paid" cost of summons. 1 Same • v E. : Wrigley. Failing to register dog.. Service of summons not proved, " ■' .■ ' : Same v 6. Colter;" Saine offence. Defendant pleaded that the money was lodged in the hands of the Town Clerk before the summons was taken out but lie had failed to get the receipt. . ■ ■ It. Brown, Hegistrar of doEts, 1 stated tha Bum ot Ss was owing. by the Council. to [defendant but could not be applied to the payment of the dog fee .without the personal application of the defendant. The money [ had since been applied to that purpose. '

Inspector Ingram, in answer, to defendant, said that lie understood from liim that the money was in the bands of the Town Clerk, aud he had ascertained that fact, Under the circumstances he would ask to withdraw on payment of the ,costs of summons. The application was granted.

Same v. B. Hoimslow. No appearance of defendant, Informant stated the dog had since been registered. Fined Is and Court costs 7s.

Same.v T, Tierney. Defendant pleaded guilty, and stated he'had since registered the dog. Fined Is and Court costs 7s.

Same vJ. Thompson. Mr Skipper for defendant. The dog having since been, registered, and Court- costs 5s paid, the summons was withdrawn, Same v C. Gurote, Defeudnut pleaded not guilty. Informant stated he saw a dog following dofendant, which he ascertained was unregistered.

Defendant said the'dog was owned in Eketahuna, and ha only had it for sale.. It had only been nine days in his possession, Fined Is and costs Defendant: I've got no money Your Worship, and nothing to destrainon, ' The Court gave defendant until 10 o'clock) next morning- to pav the amount. "'■Telegraphic.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18890621.2.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume X, Issue 3236, 21 June 1889, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
331

R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume X, Issue 3236, 21 June 1889, Page 2

R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume X, Issue 3236, 21 June 1889, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert