Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

R.M. COURT.

MAdTERTON-FEIDAY.

JOHS FABIAN V. PETER OBAV. : . For tho - defence,; several Maori witnesses wore called to prove that for days they hadnot been provided wjth food, and had for a time to subsist on cabbage trees, eels,- and .wild honey. Getting tired of this primitive food, they had agreed. together to sell five bags of grass seed to procure a variation of the. diet. .They sold five bags to Messrs Lowes and lorus, aud, with the exception of 18s spent in flour and meat, the Natives divided the money;amongst them. In cross-examination, ii was elicited that it was the intention of the witnesses to keep back half the grass seed,\nd send it for sale to Carterton, This the prompt action of the plaintiff prevented thein from doing as he seized the bags when loaded on the trucks' at Kopuaranga Station, and had them sent on to Greytown. In giving judgmbnt, His Worship said although the defendant's conduct had- been- highly reprehensible, he would „not hold, it as criminal "Mr Fabian had been Btriotly within the law-in taking the present proceedings. It was not surprising to find the natives had sold the five bags of grass.seed to obtain food, and he had- no' doubt that it. was their original intention when realising on them though the evidence, showed they did noHltinmtely do so. Gray was wrong to make arrangements with tbo natives: to dispose!of his share of,the grass seed without the consent of Fabian, he would not convict him of the'charge although he had been guilty of wrong doing. It was only fair and right, however, that he should pay the costs of the 'prosecution; and in dismissing him he should order the expenses, of the witnesses and the solicitor of the proseoution to be paid by him, subject, however, toauy point that Mr Skjppermiglit raise in objection,

The case of Ed. H. Beecham v Thomas Lyons was allowed to stand over by consent of both sides until Tuesday noxt. WRONGFULDISMISSAL. , Mesuch v, Cade, claim £15155. Mr Skipper for plaintiff, Mr Pownall for defendaut. The evidence of plaintiff was taken, and. tho case adjourned till Tuesday, March sth.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18890302.2.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume X, Issue 3143, 2 March 1889, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
358

R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume X, Issue 3143, 2 March 1889, Page 2

R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume X, Issue 3143, 2 March 1889, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert