CORRESPONDENCE.
(To the Editor.)
Silt,-What a "We don't want to fight, but by jingo if we' do get," some otthese Alfredton Biding people \m, if one:mußf judge from the representative members-sent from time to timeto the County Council, and withal' most'unreasonable. Are they 'to expect forsooth, that they should have a. voice in the' administration ;of afifairs within their own riding, when matters are so economically worked i for them,by so syinpatJutk and .eoniidtratt a Council, jockeyed by bo able and infallible a County Engineer. That a Gouhoillov should presume to acquaiut his; district of the short comings-Imean the infallMity-ol the Council or Engineer, or both, it matters.not, is aa offence that Met not \bo tolerated in' these, the dark ages. ■■" Councillors, or a Councillor, must understand some of the uses of the gag, under pains and penalties, when ho is admitted to tkwdtr,, and should never question the' rujhjgs -pf infallibility. '' The Chairman's riojing' 1 is—never divulge outside, jjiit "the matter can be discussed ad lib at the Council table, and the gag can be applied at any time. The people J have already referred to are a fighting, race, and have fought in the ,past,to some : purpose. .Would the -£2600 loorji dishonesty- have terminated with} put a fight apl a protracted one £ Wpld the;MajiawaJridgfi;M#ljei ' saddled p»Jhe;*ight horse withoui a 1 fight? No/arid'it took>grambiing and growling enough to effect this. Ratepayers in this'part of the county are at one as JiJ" the utility' of the
Wairarapa North ComJpiystemi' / Iri! i : Bhort.they do:not believe"in it.;' I| understand ■[ that about nine tenths;?? have signed 'a.'petition. in tavor'ofhav-" ing the Eketahuna-Tihui road declare'd" & district one"; Tins must show gross": irigratitude, coming as it does from a" ■■fciiy othe.p part) of the '• County, 'Have, thelatter/news' from the: Couris| and if such be : thfc" Engineer," Biif^ure This" ; sS's^enti^#k : Midly fe;^'lp:/Engineer saysj^t,:tna ; ; attention "bestowed is, gtate;6|' , i|hft i iciad. The road beteihßßLwe;had a right to: &';iuoa-.Jan ;; 'unusuaily- dry waspii" aiidlte'bnsfi falling two years ago,": The Engineer -will hardly- to credit" to himself'.'for.' either of these .two,. .causes.'" The. County Engineer,';'in' oomplajning of pome remnks by: Cr ; 'Sinitli,'iß ■repbyted to bawftid. >• 'that.'' ; ■ "Cr Smith'reiterated a 'ataMment'made'-'. bj;:;^"-^^!!;"^!^*' 1 County "Engineer „.,may" : bes r in order in complaining of.; i; > fail'tb. Beo.;wHat either lie or theV, Council lias- to do' with ; me"<ir ; ■with a : ny' ! remar| I find myself ea®:up6nt6,inale; "If .stoma remark wa?. made by nie I rdnst,have been] speak-' ing from the Engineer's over estimate;: :audeariyintljefinanoialyear r whefeag.: Viejs epeakiug'from actual, expendi-iv tore, with all data beforo him.. How-: over : he admits'£B2 to my fairlygood for :> tair'splitting, was too near to;'be remind the Engineer that Sy charge.
was one of extravagance against' the Council, and tlia) the attemptto makd it a personal matter is. uncalled for. ; My accusations against the County system as carriedon in l have always- intended to be general, and not personal, I shall not enter into the merits of the collapsed cuU vert discussiou in the Council, not; knowing the preoise charge, but tHia: muohl'cansay/that Iwasa witness to all Cr Smith .said, at the meeting" referred to, and ;I hea|Jfc\ stronger language from him thatfroiat is heard generally in -the'district. As to the' imbedded culveifc on the road, and which-has lain; there,;:>yell; it is bo; 16'figl'canuot •remember. 1 --'- This Ido know,.that these' same oulverts—six,' of them—were - applied for by the -Engineer was a member ofthe Council; wh'o' strongly Council, and ihysolf as CouTOor thiat: they wore positively necessary, > Nowhe iudignaivtly affirms that this par-" ■ticular oolvert >ir not required, .and' that- k ought : to-know. What he; ought \p have said is that .the culvert is absolutely • required, amhthat tlw water cannot get away'' except by .flooding tlio tpadr- If- the disousßlon althVlaai Cpunoil'meeting shows one .thingmore it is simply ■.ihls,-:that; the 'Engineer cannot effithe maintenance ofallso called County roads." This is esactly-sWhat the of tho North WahmpaCounty "system have, maintained; it bo expected: that a resident'of-nMasterfcon cau sowell aud efficiently isapevintend "a road; some thirty or forty, miles away, as * bpdj.of:rden;l:;mayßay on the spot!; the.work is loft aud musi'hi) left, to the honesty of the roadmen.- '..■•■'
v '.:■;.; lam&c. . Cms. MACQuuars. Alfredton,..27tb. June, 1887.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18870702.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume IX, Issue 2638, 2 July 1887, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
692CORRESPONDENCE. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume IX, Issue 2638, 2 July 1887, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.