CORRESPONDENCE.
W. ARTHUR, JUNR., BLAIR- . LOME. [To ihe Editor.] Sir,—ln your paper of 3rd inst,, you state .that " so positive were tho polico as to his identity that thoy: Communicated <vith his father in jlunedin, who arrived here on Monday night, and identified the man as his son.". Permit me,'sirj to state that ]U above is„exactly.,what the police did not do. No communication ever appears to have ;been made to 'Mr ; Arthur, sehr., between the 11th (when W, Bagge's report wan handed to them) and the 29th January, whonMr Arthur received.a telegram from a' person at Herbertville who claims the reward of L 25,, which should have hkn" ty\ Bagge'g if the police (Mr Arthur's ostensible agents) had communicated with the latter gentleman or directed W.Bagge to do 50... Apologising for taking up so much: of your paper, I am, etc.,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18870204.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume IX, Issue 2516, 4 February 1887, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
141CORRESPONDENCE. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume IX, Issue 2516, 4 February 1887, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in