CORRESPONDENCE.
■» A COSTLY HOBSE.
(To the .Editor.)
Sir.—l see by the report of the case Robinßon v The ■ Maßterton Borough Council, that the plaintiff stated in his evidence that he advertised for his horse after helost it. The natural inference would be that he advertised it previous to its being sold from the pound. lam in a position, however, to prove-that Robinson only advertised it two days after the pound sale, By the way, would it not be well if the members of the Masterton Borough Council took an early opportunity to enlighten the ratepayers as to the total coat of the litigation that has taken place over this notorious horse and the gratificationofperemptorarilydismissitig instead of supporting a Boroughi' officer. lam (fee, . ... H. Bently.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18841216.2.8
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VI, Issue 1866, 16 December 1884, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
124CORRESPONDENCE. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VI, Issue 1866, 16 December 1884, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in