Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

R.M. COURT.

GREYTOW-WEDNESDAY. (Before H. S. Wardeli, R.M, J, Donald, and J. Bidwiu, J.P.s.) Constablo Darby v- Carl Jensen. Assault and-wounding. This was a case remandod yesterday from Greytown, in order that the injured man. who was in the hospital, could give liia evidence. Peter Christian (the injured mau) stated that he was with the accused on the 10th instant, on the road near Carterton. That they went together to the house of tho accused. They had some slight quarrel there but could not recollect what about. That when he was leaving, and was just inside tho fence tho accused struck him two blows with his fist, knocking him against the fence, and he felt the staples of the fence on'his head, In cross-examination Christian admitted that he had twice fallen off his horse that same afternoon, but the falls did not hurt him. He was also a little drunk. For the defence two witnesses were called who stated that on the night in question the man Christian was drunk on horseback,, at the Marquis of Normality Hotel, Carterton, That after riding backward and forward for some time he went off up the road where he was found on the ground, quite insensible and unable to move.' He was taken to Ray's Hotel, where they-left him reeling about at the back of the house. . i Tho Bench dismissed the case.

George Chamberlain was' charged by Const. T, o.' Smith with having been drunk

and disorderly at Hodder'a hotel, Featheraton, on tlio 7th June last. Dofendant pleaded guilty and was fined 203 and costs, Another charge against the same defendant of refusing to leave the hotel when requested to do so was dismissed.

Const. Smith v. Samuel Myers,—Hawking goods without a license. Fined 40s.

William MoKay was oharged by Const. Smith with having stolen a coat, the property of G. H, Buckridge. Defendant pleaded guilty but said he lied been drinking so hard that he knew nothing of the matter, Eepnmanded and discharged. Const, Smith v. Jam6s Rowe,-Defendant was oharged with a breach of the Cemetery Act 1882, by disturbing persons assembled at the Featherston cemetery to bury. Fined £5 and costs 40s, or .14 days' hard labor.' Another case of a similar nature was withdrawn.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18840717.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 6, Issue 1738, 17 July 1884, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
375

R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 6, Issue 1738, 17 July 1884, Page 2

R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 6, Issue 1738, 17 July 1884, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert