R.M. COURT.
[Before H. S. Wabdell„K.M.| ' MABTERTON—THUBSDAY,; D.; F. McCarthy v, Mel and Diamond.—Debt £42. Mr Beard appeared for plaintiff, Mr Buckley for defendants. ' - - - This was a claim for the value of in order for goods supplied to Messrs Powell and Archibald, two contractor who were felling bush for defendants. J'lie men had given the order on their employers to plaintiff, who forwarded .it to Messrs Cattel and Diamond for liaymeftt, They, however, took no notise of the application, nor did they return the order, from which Mr McCarthy understood thafcthoyaccepted it, and sued upon it. Defendants denied having accepted the order, and as plaintiff could not prove: Ihey had done ro he, was nonsuited.
■His Worship remarked that .lie should not allow defendant's costs, as they had acted very wrongly in retaining the order iti their possession so long without intimating that they did not intend to honor-it. .
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18830907.2.8
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 5, Issue 1477, 7 September 1883, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
149R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 5, Issue 1477, 7 September 1883, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in