CORRESPONDENCE.
To THE EDITOR', y ;":';'';.- Bm.—Your dboaV.rontemporaryJias been Borely exercised over my letter, htoly published in your- columns, and in the excitemehj; yof/ passion he- is both, unjust.aid. ungenerous, orto,nse one of hiaown beauti) fnl"'rnetaph'or,:'!! like a" pi? witrta ohobpeJ tail," To releiye,,him; of part»pf<biß' grievance 1 must apologise "for having uncoh' in alluding toMr Beetham'e reported speech'. "If ifwiil fie any I shall >be happy to prove' tojklrjditor of the Star that .1 an 'not in any way connMleT with"'the' Press,"thank goodness-being neither 1 ; editor;' printer, nor printer's dgyil r ,und;l h,6pe ; he :will nof Be owndevu anymore.''There is one part of your contemporary's- leader of Saturday, to whibhj' in seU-defehoeV I must refer, ¥He
Mouses m©off^bai;otthc^rophy. M I shall be glad if he.wiU onlightea myjignorance by iconMcending'y.to explain ;hia meaning 5 i first. 1 however, consulting;■'» good dictionary or a good small boy at tho publio school, so 'that ne may; not be in the poaition.of blind leading blind, .VAs the Star, however, has isefc up ■ for an . unimpeaohable authority on grammar',;; and ...■ general •: knowledge, perhaps a' 'few choice.; specimens ".. exitraoted:^w^ the•,.erflahing , "loader" lie an apology jf er (any] slip „ of: tho (pen 6j! a poor ;oounty.eleotor,.uForithe,'benefltii;of.,your \ readers^piithe^following:-"" By an ingenious jbut{veiry transparent device he - tnes.tb throw some of the odium so ifichly /" .earned;by ; our local,contemporary, <jbyMa miarepuling of this and the"' jtfarnala tftheyallcy,"-, "lihappem thatbesidctto •reporter; |for this jourqalilha ■tbe ; local paper was.present, &o.*jTheabove" • are from aro from that inimitable gushing effusion of. grand- bathos-" Ihe trip to the Forty-mile , : B']«h." Uk'hugt'viavei,%u^m : iio the :deßcen>|»ppear[pfeßipitous.',', .",Thero itm ; bare rooks b'f'thfi 'rijhest soil apiidm\tly mrywken." ;J "As the pair wrmhed holtor htlltr in the same tetion.'! ; V' ; The pumpkin jam and cream were aimply 'delicions'and'the.offier vege-talk-all the produots of our entertainer*' ■• gardens' -were beyond all praißeV!; i "iWithV .ootfages overgrown .by ■ ro?ea [find- ntat qar'But I rifaW respect your spaceVand&lot your readers refen to,'the local columns of the : Star,for December 16th for further and then; judge between my letter &nd the paper that condemned it.... .Li y lam, io, •'■■•'• '- '"■•?, ■ ' . A CooNTir Elector. [Country newspapers, from the! condition? under which" they' ate" publishedr'Me' ; ; usually prolific in verbal inaccuracies, We vVifail, however, to see that any publio ['."■■ benefit is to be obtained by the practice, : instituted by '-our -contemporary and followed by our,;'obrrespondent, of calling vpublic'attentio'n to them.—tin. W.D.j
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18821220.2.8
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 4, Issue 1259, 20 December 1882, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
389CORRESPONDENCE. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 4, Issue 1259, 20 December 1882, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.