R.M. COURT.
TINUI-FRIDAY.
[Before Messrs R. Maunbmi and R. , Langdon, J.f'e.j J. E. Nathan vJ. .Garrod.—Debt is 83 lid. No appearance of defendant, Judgment for plaintiff for amount and costs. Same v E, Humphries.— Debt lo- 9a, Defendant pleaded that he had paid amount due to the plaintiff, and apDlied for an adjournment to next sitting whett the plaintiff would bo present.—Adjourni- J ment granted. \ Same v A; Nicholls, Junr.-Debt LIS 12s 9d. Defendant pleaded that ho was. under twenty-one years of ago, and therefore not liable, and adjournment to enable age. The case was sitting. : 0a 9d. Aft ei' the Court had heard (kSSBBB evidence tho case was adjourned to next sitting, There were several cases settled out of Court,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18821023.2.7
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 4, Issue 1210, 23 October 1882, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
121R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 4, Issue 1210, 23 October 1882, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in