RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
MASTERTON, THtJ.RSDAY.
[Before H, S. Wardell, Esq., R.M.] pqitoii()i}By-i.Awg. J. C. Ingram v. Bapp and Hare.— Breach of ,Borough. by : lawsV I Exposing ggn4s fir Ml? fa fwtpath, Fined 5s and BBSOOINQ OATMB. James Nlool v John Eofliens— Breach of Impounding Act. Mr Bunny for plaintiff—Two charges. Fined 20s and cost in each case. Joseph Williams v Ngarori Tamahana. —Debt S& #3, for amount and cost: J " Job Vile v John Hughes.— £3 4's. Judgment fnr'aiuourit and cost. :' * 'lj, Jroyjj y. J. 0. Frazi-I)ebfl4 fup amount ijij4 costs, \yilliam Bell y A. Ills yd. Judgm'ent for' ainount lino) cost. Q Jacqqes y T, McCarthy.-4rjebt £id j.2s <jd.. l\fr Ripper .'fur piaintif Mr Bqiiny for defendant. .Judgment for amount and costs. V. Hodge v t Be?ar.-01aim m 8s lOd. Evidence taken under an.application from the Wanganui Court and forprded there,
, joiiopu BATES. Several defaulting ratepayers were sued for the amount of. their arrears, in some of. which judgment'was confessed, others settled out of Court, or adjourned, snd judgment given for amount and cost in the remainder, ;/■';.,; ;
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18810805.2.7
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 3, Issue 838, 5 August 1881, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
178RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 3, Issue 838, 5 August 1881, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in