Magistrate’s Court.
Before Mr J. Keddell, d.M.
THU BSD AY, MAY 0
Licknsing Cask
Michael Burke, charged with being m licensed premises at Studhohne function while a prohibition order was in force against him, did not appear. Evidence was given by Constable Gough, Gl .mavy, that ho saw defendmt about to enter Btudholme Junction Hotel and warned him not to. He replied that he did not care and entered. Defendant was present when i the order was issued against him. Defendant was similarly charged I with entering the Glonavy Hotel. i Constable Christie gave evidence as 'o serving a prohibition order on j lefendant. A fine of .C2 was inflicted for the case at Studholmo and JU for that at Glenavy. Costs £2 12s 4d.
In City Council v. McLean judgment was again reserved. Evans and -Sin v. J. Albert, claim .£3 15s. No appearance. Judgment tor amount with JGI 12s costs.
Before M essrs Manchester, Petit and Coltman, J.’s P
Donald McKay, a witness in the case McDonough v. Quinn was charged with neglecting to attend when subpoenaed. He was fined £2 and-ordered to refund tho (L conduct money paid him.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDA19020510.2.12
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waimate Daily Advertiser, Volume IV, Issue 201, 10 May 1902, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
192Magistrate’s Court. Waimate Daily Advertiser, Volume IV, Issue 201, 10 May 1902, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in