Arbitration Court Awards.
WELLINGTON, July 29. At tlie Arbitration Court to-da’j Rouse and Hurrell, coachbuilders, weiifined 40s, fees and cos' s, for employing a nh-nber of journeymen at less thai the minimum wage of 10i per day stated in the industrial award. The Court w.ished it Understood that in fnture cases * where breaches were clearly ptdyed, ana - where a second breach was proved, h would be severe in its penalty. T|il awards /(vsre not mere . wtote-|iapeb.> affairs, but were serious judgments. H the Court found that employers or workmen thought they could commit breaches of awards with impunity, then it would deal severely. The award! . must be obeyed, and the Court woos insist upon the conditions being carried out.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDA19010801.2.6
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waimate Daily Advertiser, Volume III, Issue 183, 1 August 1901, Page 1
Word count
Tapeke kupu
119Arbitration Court Awards. Waimate Daily Advertiser, Volume III, Issue 183, 1 August 1901, Page 1
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in