Magistrate's Court.
Thuusday, April 25
Before Mtjor KedJMl, o.M
SUPPLYING PRDHICITKD PKR3ON. Ceorge Johnson was chargeil witn supplying liquor io a VvViineto tra-.!eS:i)an : a prohibite I p M'son, (vi the I'd- h iii.st. Mr Cieuieit, for defendant, jdeaded nor giiilty. After hearing lire eviilene > of doustahle Q'Jdalioren and J. C.-; telle, itemise l was ii ied e-t-. 0, wJo costs ISs. Tire M-igistr:iie, in the inoxirnivo penalty, ciniLirat ulated Constable O'ilallo.ao on his activity iuiheeso' ■airJ uuoouiice.! his intention of dealing severely with such castes in I'm ore. Tne Line vyis paid by the prohibited pe.so.tj. MAINTEXANCE. George Knight applied to have t:v mainfmiai.ico or ler of os per w ■■■■k for thefiunport of his m-'th'M-i-tt-iii---.-dj es ho was not able to pay ir. A tier hearing tho evidence of del'e'idaut and il'ndiard Kuig-.t decision was reserved. GORSB CASKS. Tlie Cpuiity Council Kiv.-d three p -rsons for failing to clear gorge OiT roads. Ao •aliourunieut was agreed on to May 6th. BREACHES OF STOCK ACT.
t Three cases of exposing i >ihv sheep for sale were i)i-in;.ghi hy the S'ock Dep-ufmeiit, ea b defendant being fined 5s an I costs. Three cases of resc-oe of ca'tle seized/or itiipOiinding. iojoiy to fence, tind- 'hi.sui(.ieg laogu ig" (\iuicoek v. Mary Young) were heard logfil \y y. Hamilton appeared for plaintiff and Mr Clement for aelendan!". Informant is tenant of land a; the Hook a ijuiniug rivoc and road. Defendant allowed cattle to trespass from the river ou to informant's -land, mid wiiou in-, seized them for the purpose of impounding them, the offences alleged took place. All witnesses were ordered out of Court. | A lengthy hea:jng took pla'oe. wlru evidence was giv-n by plai tiff, E. G. Baxter, Thomas M.-Kenzie and Jobo Wilson. Mr Cietne'it said defendant ''claimed equal rights in the riverbe I, which pi.iiit-iff had fe iced across. The langthag.- .com pi .lined of was due loan unlawful seizure. Defendant an I Annie Young gave evidence that the cattle were not ou Mr Mnlcock's land, but were on the riverbed. Defendant was fined £1 aud costs (£2 10s) for using language liable to provoke a breach of the peace, and for iv* U -g the ia. tie, i2 with costs (tl £s). Tbe third part of the information was missed. A counter claim was withdrawn by consent. A case pi disobedience of a maintenance order was dismissed. . Several civil cases were either struck out or settled out of Court,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDA19010427.2.17
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waimate Daily Advertiser, Volume III, Issue 142, 27 April 1901, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
409Magistrate's Court. Waimate Daily Advertiser, Volume III, Issue 142, 27 April 1901, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.