Passing Notes.
by nE:,n Prtiia.
When it was proposed af. the ir.coi- «■£? of Sfc. Thomas' parishioners id 1 Wellington on Thnruhy uight that the i&vel ki« ikl le rccomnurSed b .Lt^alj uai c^iso in churc\ U'atttiVs, a lady rose in the body of tl &^ school and emphatically protcste I dguiust the motion. One of h< r giouncU of objoecion was tliat t1.6 grant of the fianchise would bo used as a levor to engineer the few mm i'ltorfstfl in chuich matters out of tho wvik altogether. The New Zealand Times says fhat the motion vv v 'at carried* however, with one dissentn." voice, which rang out like a warm..!? note amidst the chorus of laughter. — jlt seems strange for a woman to Jioppose the motion, and one of her objections is a very peculiar on^. fcjlio admitted thrib thfi'e were very fow m3ii iiitereSLLed in ehvu'fih work, and yet &he preferred that these few men (should have all the '"say" in governing ;\ I chuich largely composed of women. ; Like all v. ouiun, bho couJdn i be At all i logical.
If there is one person more thnn another who seems to me to h.ive a'i pp'sv life, it i& the boro igh binfaccmai Tune ami acun 1 intended to wui.about it, but always fc+ioucjht that ojih oi the councillors would bang tluj luaUei up, bus no one Lab uvei do:,e bu, tiud H rciiitiius l'oi H P. to mantiou it. If an employer pays a man £2 pc week, he «xpt cts and should get nt. least £2 10* worth of « ork out of th.>.c man The borough pays its surfaceman ;£1 per week, not an extravagant sum certainly, and does io got £1 worth ot work ? Those who have \\ atcher" s his woik for a week answer ujos. decidedly, "No !" Any boy of IS years of ago would do more in tbv time. Of course there ere alwvyj certain people who have nothing to <"h and so must be kept amused by '• yai ;i ing " but that isn't what the Borousjh Council empl'iy a nn.n for. 'Jhe quantity of woik vouldo't be bo bad. if the right woik were uudurtaki.ii , but it ib not. Ouly on Monday tiit suiij,ceman vtas basy digging oat t'uo weeds fiom atnoijgt,t the shingle lat< h put down in the lower end of Shea Im.in street. These weeds were doing no harm, and not likely to go to see*-', and this was the most useless bit ol work 1 pvor saw done. There ma miles of water tables in the borou v which need seeing to, but " handle ' seems to be very fond of staying ut town. At least one of the stieeU mentioned in the Works Committee' 1 * report as requiring repairs was spoil. •;.' solely by water banking up. because i couldn't get away through the prop' > channel. I think I have said enou^'t to prove that the surfaceman ismeiek' a pensioner on the Lorough Couuc and that body, as well as any ouu, other, hao a right to get value lt,r wages paid without allowing oi'hu. questions to enter into the matter.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDA19000503.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waimate Daily Advertiser, Volume II, Issue 140, 3 May 1900, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
520Passing Notes. Waimate Daily Advertiser, Volume II, Issue 140, 3 May 1900, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.