Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MR. WARDEN SCHAW.

(to the editor of the west coast tiiies.)

Sib, — In a letter published in your issue of yestcj day, and t. ; gued " Scrutator," the writer, while assorting t!iut lie is personally unknown to Mr Warden Schaw, for whom' he kindly acts as champion, mercifully extends his forgiveness to you for having written a leading article calling into question the legality and j uatiee of the refusal of that gentleman to receive the verdict of the four jurymenj urymen duly empannelcd and sworn. Scrutator) according tohis own statement, is versed in the law bearing on the case, and knows what Mr Warden Schaw did in November last with reference to inspecting the ground in dispute, and what verdict was then given. An apology is tendered for the Warden's fqrgetfulness of that verdict, when the case was heard last week, and Scrutator being fully aware of the clearing away of the cloud that had obscured Mr Schaw's memory, just as the jury brought in a verdict adverse to, the one previously given by him, and that no appeal had been subsequently made, says that the assessors' verdict could not have legally been received. The true facts of the case are, however, well known to us who were presomVin Court during the hearing of the case, and as tho public have had the matter, jn part, brought before them, we think they Bhould know nothing less than the " whole truth." The plaintiff Clark, immediately after tho case was heard the lirst time, nvido an application of appeal, which was refused by Mr Warden Schaw, who asserted that his verdict was law. The. dictum was, however, modified when the land was registered, by Mr Warden Schaw consenting"" to re-hear the case. The fact of a jury being summoned to attend, and J how they were treated when they brought in a verdict is already known to the public, aud we certainly think that some stronger aud better arguments than those used by Scrutator will have to be used to justify the arbitrary conduct of Mr Warden .Schaw, with an appearance of either law or equity. We arc, yours &c., Three Spectators in CdintT.

We learn that Messrs Edwards and Mader have purchased an additional extent of frontage, for tho purpose of further enlarging the Criterion Hotel, and that they propose at once to erect a bail-room of sixty-five feet in length, and of proportionate breadth. So rapidly is the work to be pressed forward, that it is expected the room will be available for a grand ball, to be given on the first proximo. Wo are informed that a deputation from the Lyceum proprietary waited yesterday upon the Commissioner, Q-. S. Sale, Esq., with' the view to having tho unsold laud on the Camp Reserve, in Revell street, offered in one lot, for the purpose of enabling the company to purchaso the entire block. The Commissioner very kindly promised to recommend this course for adoption at head-quarters.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WCT18660919.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

West Coast Times, Issue 309, 19 September 1866, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
496

MR. WARDEN SCHAW. West Coast Times, Issue 309, 19 September 1866, Page 2

MR. WARDEN SCHAW. West Coast Times, Issue 309, 19 September 1866, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert