Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OTHER PEOPLE’S IDEAS

PHOSPHATES & PRODUCTION (To the Editor.) Sir—ln your issue of 7th inst. there appears a letter over the nom-de-plume of “Townie Cel,” which is so mischievous in its implications that it is surprising that it should find space in a responsible journal. The writer is evidently not aware of a fact which must be known to .you, viz., that the reason why farming is not classed as an essential occupation is that the Farmers’ Union is opposed to it being so classed. They may have good reasons for this, but it is their responsibility.

The most mischievous part of the letter, however, is where he asks: “Why was the. offer of a quantity of phosphates from America refused?” and then goes on to say that this refusal caused a shortage in the quantity of w’heat grown this season. If this v?ere true, then it would give every farmer and producer a reason for rejecting the Government's appeal for more production. Fortunately it is not true, and I contend “Townie Cel” should have been required to produce his authority for his statement before his letter was published. I have been in touch with Mr Nash, and as a result I can state that far from “Townie Cel’s ’ statement being correct, it is the exact opposite of the truth. I can if required furnish detailed information showing the constant endeavours made and, being made to obtain the necessary phosphates. I apologise for occupying your space, but the incorrect statement regarding phosphates seemed to me to be so subversive of our war effort that I feel it is a plain duty to correct it. If your correspondent cares to reply to this over his own name, I shall take notice, but I respectfully submit that statements as serious as the one in question, unless supported by the writer’s identity, should not be published when we are at war and the production front is so vitally important.— Yours, etc. . J. ROBERTSON, Masterton, December 10.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAITA19431210.2.36

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Times-Age, 10 December 1943, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
332

OTHER PEOPLE’S IDEAS Wairarapa Times-Age, 10 December 1943, Page 3

OTHER PEOPLE’S IDEAS Wairarapa Times-Age, 10 December 1943, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert