Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ALLEGED SLACKNESS

IN DIRECTION OF WAR IN NEW GUINEA CRITICISM OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. BY MEMBER OF OPPOSITION EXECUTIVE. (Special Australian Correspondent.) SYDNEY, July 31. An accusation that the Australian Government had permitted the Japanese to march unmolested from Buna toward Port Moresby has been madeby a member of the executive of the Federal Opposition, Mr J. P. Abbott, in a special statement following o meeting of the executive. Mr Abbott was Minister for Home Security inthe Menzies and Fadden Governments. “Not only for the preservation of Australia, but also to assist the common war effort, the Japanese must be thrown out of Papua, and progressively the campaign should be waged from island to island,” he said. “The islands of the south-west Pacific should be the Achilles heel of the Axis.” Russia and China were in a desperate position, Mr Abbott continued. Though Russia had not yet been attacked by Japan, there was no doubt that when Hitler ordered an attack the full might of Japan would be thrown against the Soviet forces in Siberia. If China was to be saved, as saved she must be, the pressure against her must be relieved. The relief could come in only one way a vigorous, sustained effort in the southwest Pacific. “The Commonwealth Government will not be defending Australia adequately, nor will the enemy be conquered so long as we are prepared passively to sit down and leave the initiative to the enemy and allow Japan to decide when and where she will strike next,” said Mr Abbott. A meeting of . the War Advisory Council was held following the meeting of the executive. It is known to be J the view of the Government that, as all matters of high war policy are put before the Council, on which the Opposition has representation, both sides of Parliament are fully committed by the Advisory War Council’s decisions on policy. Mattei’s of administration do not come under the Council’s jurisdiction.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAITA19420801.2.59.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Times-Age, 1 August 1942, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
325

ALLEGED SLACKNESS Wairarapa Times-Age, 1 August 1942, Page 5

ALLEGED SLACKNESS Wairarapa Times-Age, 1 August 1942, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert