Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LIFE IMPRISONMENT

NEILING SENTENCED VERDICT OF MANSLAUGHTER. “A VILE AND BRUTAL CRIME.” (By Telegraph—Press Association.) WELLINGTON, This Day. After a retirement of four hours and a half, including the tea adjournment c£ an hour, the jury in the Supreme Court, Wellington, last night returned a verdict of guilty of manslaughter j against Leonard Neiling. brushmaker, aged 29, whose trial for the murder of Marjorie Livingstone Horton began on Monday. The Chief Justice (Sir Michael Myers) sentenced Neiling to imprisonment for life. When the jury announced its verdict al 9.8 p.m. and the prisoner was asked if he hhd anything to say why sentence should not be passed, he said: “I have this to say. I am innocent of the charge.” “I feel,” said prisoner's senior counsel, Mr W. E. Leicester, "that though the prisoner has made that observation. as counsel for the defence I should say this: “The defence feels that what it has boon permitted to say throughout the trial is sufficient, with) this exception. I feel il is my duty to draw the attention of your Honour to the fact that the evidence- shows that defendant was affected, or presumably affected, by liquor at the lime the incidents took place.” Upon his Honour asking for information about a conviction for assault on a female recorded against prisoner’ in 1938, Mr T. P. McCarthy, junior counsel for prisoner, who appeared for prisoner on that occasion also, said that a drunken brawl took place in Petone, and during a struggle Miss Rangiwhetu. who had given evidence on the murder charge, was hit.

"You have been found guilty of a vile, sordid and brutal offence.” said his Honour to prisoner, “and you have been convicted upon evidence which the jury have regarded as conclusive, and I share that view. They have taken a merciful view of the case in finding you guilty of manslaughter only. I shall not take on myself the responsibility of allowing you to be at large, even after the fairly substantial term that is usually imposed nowadays for the offence of manslaughter. The way in which you knocked this woman about and then raped her—knocked her about in such a way as to cause her death—these acts, as I say, constitute a vile and brutal crime. The sentence of the Court is that you be 1 imprisoned and kept at hard'labour for life.”

After prisoner had left the dock his Honour explained to the jury that the sentence did not mean that prisoner would remain in prison for life. It would depend on himself. If he could, after a certain period, satisfy the Prisons Board that he was safe to be at large they would act accordingly, but in the meantime he had a duty to protect the public from men of that kind.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAITA19410516.2.72

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Times-Age, 16 May 1941, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
467

LIFE IMPRISONMENT Wairarapa Times-Age, 16 May 1941, Page 6

LIFE IMPRISONMENT Wairarapa Times-Age, 16 May 1941, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert