BID FOR TRONDHEIM

Wairarapa Times-Age, 10 May 1940, Page 5

BID FOR TRONDHEIM

MR CHURCHILL ON BRITISH EFFORT BALANCE TURNED AGAINST ENEMY. WAR CABINET DIVISIONS DENIED. By Telegraph—Press Association—Copyright. LONDON, May 8. Referring in his speech in the House of Commons to the development of the situation in Norway when the German, thrust north from Oslo was making it worse, Mr Winston Churchill said that the Norwegians were unable to hold the mountain passes and could not destroy the roads and railways. The possibility of the arrival of large German forces south of Trondheim had to be forseen. Intense German bombing of Namsos and Andalsnes prevented the landing of large reinforcements and even artillery supplies for the troops that had already landed.

, The decision to withdraw was un- . doubtedly sound. The withdrawal of , 12.000 men —less than a division —was , accomplished with the greatest skill » and good luck. “The question arises whether if we had persisted with a direct naval attack it would havq been better,” Mr. Churchill said. “I have always believed that the Navy could carry troops into Trondheim Fiord, land them and come to grips with the enemy. I would have been glad to take all the responsibility for an attempt provided it was supported by the experts. “Even if the opinion that we could have mastered Trondheim by April 25 were correct, could we have brought a sufficient army south from Trondheim to repel the invader? The Germans could be reinforced more quickly than us. There were no means whereby the air superiority could be overcome. We should have been committed to a forlorn operation on an ever-increasing scale. CONTEST IN THE NORTH. We are now fighting hard for northern Norway, particularly for Narvik, where the conditions are more equal. We are in possession of the Narvik aerodrome. “It is an injury to our war-making capacity that we should be forced to detail this story. We do not learn from the German leaders truthful acI counts of all their motives and I hope it will be the last time we confer’ this benefit on them. We have decided to speak thus plainly because of the cataract of unworthy suggestions and actual falsehoods pouring out to the public in the last few days. “A picture has been drawn of craven politicians hampering the admirals and generals. There is not a word of truth in a suggestion that I proposed more violent action to the Prime Minister and the .• War Cabinet and that they restrained me. “I sympathise with Admiral Keyes’s desire to plan and lead a violent attack on Trondheim and repeat Zeebrugge’s immortal glories, but I am sorry that this impulse has led him to cast aspersions on his old shipmates. I have complete confidence in their sagacity, massive good sense and professional knowledge, and I believe the Fleet has confidence in them. I love to hear the German wireless lies about all the British ships that have been sunk so many times over, and to survey the fool’s paradise in which they keep their deluded serfs and robots. TRUTH AGAINST NAZI LIES. “The Germans claim to have sunk or damaged 11 of our battleships. Actually, two were slightly damaged, but neither was withdrawn from the service for one day. They claimed tljat three aircraft-carriers were seriously damaged. Actually, one was slightly damaged by a near miss, and she is still in service. The Germans claim to have sunk or damaged 28 cruisers. Actually one cruiser and one anti-air-craft ship was damaged. “We lost 11 trawlers in the Government service. That explains all these battleships. “It seems to me that in spite of Hitler’s overrunning Norway the advantages rest substantially with us. Hitler has lost 10 lives for every one of ours. Hitler has compelled a large part of Scandinavia to enter the Nazi empire of hungry land. He has commited an act of self-blockade. Our control of sea-borne commerce should become even more effective. The Norwegian corridor no longer exists. Denmark, after her food resources are exhausted, will no longer be a channel of trade. “The British and French mercantile fleets can now rely on the invaluable co-operation of the Norwegian merchant fleet, the fourth largest in the world. The British and French shipping losses since the outbreak of the war are barely 800.000 tons, and the captures and new ships building have already compensated for three-quarters of that. “If Sweden had come to Norway’s rescue, if large numbers of her troops , could have entered Trondheim, if her air bases had been at the disposal of the Royal Air Force, a very different position might soon have been established. The Swedish action was like . that of many other people who have , criticised the British Government.” GERMANS AT NARVIK SAID TO BE IN DANGER OF STARVATION. FOOD DROPPED BY PARACHUTE. ] (By Telegraph—Press Association.) LONDON, May 9. The Swedish radio reports that' a snowstorm is raging at Narvik, mak- , ing operations difficult. The Norwegian High Command em- - phasises that guerrilla fighting con- , tinues in the Roros sector in southern Norway, and the Germans have suf- . fered heavily. The German forces at j Narvik are reported to be in danger j of starvation, due to an insufficiency ( of supplies dropped by parachute. c I ( BETTER TIME COMING ' ASSURANCE TO FRENCH ALPINE 5 TROOPS. i LONDON. May 9. J The French General Mittclhai.iscr, q

addressing French Alpine troops in a British northern town after their return from Namsos said: “When you take up the duties for which you are equipped you will be protected against bombardment from the air and strike decisively against the adversary who boasted too early.”