“STUNNING DEFEAT”

Wairarapa Times-Age, 21 July 1939, Page 5

“STUNNING DEFEAT”

U.S.A. NEUTRALITY LAW POSTPONEMENT

“NEW YORK TIMES” TAKES SERIOUS VIEW. “INVITATION TO WAR." By Telegraph—Press Association —Copyright WASHINGTON. July 19. In the conference in Ihe While House between Ilu_‘ President and the leaders of t lie Denioeralie and Republican Parties, at which Air Roosevelt finally agreed to abandon his pressure for amendment of the neutrality law in the present session of Congress, the discussions liecaine extremely healed, especially exchanges between Senator Bo- • rah and the State Secretary, Air Cordell Hull.

Senator Borah apparently challenged the authenticity or candour of "confidential reports" of which Mr Hull and Mr Roosevelt spoke so much as showing a threat of a further crisis in Europe.

Senator Borah said he considered his own sources of information just as reliable as those of the Department of State, whereupon Mr Hull took offence and everybody, including the President, spoke at once.

The Vice-President, Mr Garner, stopped the useless discussion by asking whether there were enough votes to force the Neutrality Bill lo the floor of the Senate, and everybody was compelled to agree that there were not, whereupon the President laughed and everybody regained his good humour.

The meeting broke up in a most friendly way, Mr Garner seeing to it that Senator Borah and Mr Hull shook hands cordially before parting.

The “New York Times” in a leader labels the postponement as “an invitation to war” and calls the step a stunning defeat for the Administration and a hard blow for all those who believe that the best hope of keeping the United States at peace lies in a policy of concerted action to make the outbreak of a general war less likely. “In blunt terms, this is an invitation to aggressor nations to use war or a threat of war to achieve their conquests,” it states. “There is no use attempting to disguise the fact that the result in Congress will bring satisfaction in Berlin and Rome.

"It will be read there as evidence that American foreign policy is still uncertain and confused and still working at cross purposes to the great disadvantage of our real national interests; but they must doubt whether this result represents the final consideration of the question on its merits, and they must note the strong belief on this side of the Atlantic that in any war which they may start the United States will ultimately play a part. "No Neutrality Act can prevent the American people from favouring their natural allies in any ultimate test of strength between democracy and dictatorship. Goodwill and moral support and, in the long run, it is more than likely, the physical power of the United States will be found on the side of those nations defending the way of life which is our own way of life and the only way of life which Americans believe to be worth living.” The leader, which is probably the strongest expression of opinion from any American newspaper relative to the present neutrality situation, occupies two columns. EMBARGO PROPOSAL NO ACTION LIKELY THIS SESSION. • WASHINGTON, July 19. A .further canvass of the situation in Congress has disclosed that there is little likelihood of action during the piesent session regarding the Japanese embargo proposals.