Court of Appeal.
(Per Press Association). Wellington, This day In the Coart of Appeal judgment was given in the case Staples and Co (brewers), v Corby. Defendant purchased a hotel from (he vendor, who had himself purchased from plaintiff}. D fendant’B vendor in the oonveyanoe to him entered into a oovenant with plaintiff} for bimsolf and assigns to sell no colonial beer other than was purchased from plaintiffs. Defendant purchased with the covenant which be had entered into before the recent legislation against “ tied homes ” Toe question was, whether defendant was bound by tho covenant and tbe Conrt held on English decisions that plaintiffs were entitled to an injunction restraining defendant from a breaob of tbe oovenant, with costs. The question of whether tho assigns of plaintiff would be entitlod to the benefit of the oovenant was left open.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAIPM18990523.2.27
Bibliographic details
Waipawa Mail, Volume XXI, Issue 3901, 23 May 1899, Page 3
Word Count
139Court of Appeal. Waipawa Mail, Volume XXI, Issue 3901, 23 May 1899, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in