Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WE RIVAL ROUTES.

(BY TELEOKAI'H- -PRESS ASSOCIATION). WELLINGTON, Last Night. A lakgely-attkndkd meeting of Auckland and Taranaki members of both Houses was held this morning to consider the report of a sub-committee on the question of the Stratford and Central routes for the completion of the North Island Main Trunk railway. The subcommittee decided, though not unanimously, iu favour of the Stratford route When the matter came up for consideration this morning it was very fully discussed, and the opinions of the two sides freely stated. The first question put to the meeting was a straight-out vote on the subject of the rival routes. This question had not been raised by the motion, and the Chairman (Sir Maurice O'Rorke) put it to the meeting purely on his own initiative. It was strongly objected to by certain members, who pointed out that no such motion bad been moved, and also that it put many of them in an awkward and unfair position, because while they preferred one route to another, if they did not get the route they wanted they would support the other. The Chairman, however, insisted on putting the motion, whereupon Messrs Brown, Bollard and Masscy refused to vote, and Messrs Lang and Monk voted under protest. On the vote being taken the division resulted as follows : —For Stratford route (11): Holland, Morris, Symes, Lawry, Harris, Jennings, MeGuire, O'Rorke, Crowther, MeGowan, and J). Kelly. For Central route (6) : Lang, Mcnk, McCullough, Hemes, Scotland and Swansou. A division was then taken on the report of the committee iu favour of the Stratford route, as follows : For report (12): Holland, Swanson, MeGowan, Kelly, Morris, Symes, Lawry, Harris, Jennings, McGuiro, Crowther and O'Rorke. Against recommendation of committee 7 : Fang, Massey, Monk, Scotland, Frown, McCullough, and Ilerries. The Hon. Mr McCullough moved a resolution that a deputation direct the attention of the Government to the necessity for completing the 12 miles oF railway to connect the Auckland end of the line with the point of divergence of the two routes. The motion was negatived on the voices, and it was decided that a deputation composed of all in favour of the Stiatford route should wait on the Premier at the earliest opportunity.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAIGUS18980927.2.18

Bibliographic details

Waikato Argus, Volume V, Issue 346, 27 September 1898, Page 2

Word Count
369

WE RIVAL ROUTES. Waikato Argus, Volume V, Issue 346, 27 September 1898, Page 2

WE RIVAL ROUTES. Waikato Argus, Volume V, Issue 346, 27 September 1898, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert