Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE LIQUOR LAWS.

(BY TELEGRAPH. PEE3S ASSOCIATION). Wellington, Last Night. The Appeal Court is hearing the case Brown v. Foley, which raises the question whether an hotel keeper can at his own expense supply a bona fide friend with liquor during prohibited hours, or can he invite him to dinner and give him liquor. Mr Skerritt, for the appellant, submitted that the prohibition was limited to the consumption of liquor purchased, although purchased before the c'osiug hours. Later. The Court unanimously decided that the appeal should be allowed. The point decided was that it is lawful for an hotelkeeper to supply liquor during prohibited hours at his own expense to a bona fide friend. The judement of the Chief Justice was affirmed with coats.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAIGUS18980524.2.23

Bibliographic details

Waikato Argus, Volume IV, Issue 292, 24 May 1898, Page 2

Word Count
124

THE LIQUOR LAWS. Waikato Argus, Volume IV, Issue 292, 24 May 1898, Page 2

THE LIQUOR LAWS. Waikato Argus, Volume IV, Issue 292, 24 May 1898, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert