Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TRESPASS CASE AT DARGAVILLE.

Joseph Draper was charged before Dr. Norton and Mr A. E. Harding J.P’s at Dargaville Police Court on Thursday last, with having unlawfully trespassed on Kaihu No. 2 block on 24 July last by digging guru thereon without permission. Mr McLeod appeared for the prosecution. Henry Robinson , ranger for the Block, deposed that he found defendant trespassing on the 4th June but did not prosecute him as he stated he had a large family and promised that he would not trespass again. Defendant had some newly dug gum which witness demanded but defendant refused to give up. Defendant also refused to give his name. Witness drew defendant’s attention to the boundary line of the Block which was clearly defined, staked, and flagged. On 24th July witness again found defendant trespassing. Defendant was in a hole digging gum. Watched him for about ten minutes then accosted him and demanded his name. Defendant replied that he hud no name. Defendant was at work within thirty yards of the spot at which witness found him on 4th June. Witness was accompanied by Mr R. J. Byrnes. R. J. Byrnes, another ranger, gave corroborative evidence. Defendant then made a statement to the effect that he had mistaken the poles of the Waimutu road for those of the Block boundary and so trespassed unknowingly. The Bench convicted defendant and fined him £1 and £1 15/6 costs, or in default 14 days imprisonment. Defendant asked for time to pay the fine but Mr McLeecl objected stating as a reason that several unexecuted warrants were now lying in Court for the arrest of defendants who had been allowed time and had left the district in the interval.

The defendant was accordingly committed but later in the day the fine was paid and prisoner discharged.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAIBE18930818.2.8

Bibliographic details

Wairoa Bell, Volume V, Issue 211, 18 August 1893, Page 3

Word Count
301

TRESPASS CASE AT DARGAVILLE. Wairoa Bell, Volume V, Issue 211, 18 August 1893, Page 3

TRESPASS CASE AT DARGAVILLE. Wairoa Bell, Volume V, Issue 211, 18 August 1893, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert