Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AN INTERESTING CASE

(By Teleijraph. —I'rcss Association.) WELLINGTON. Last Night.

A test case concerning rates was brought before Mr Justice Chapman at the Supreme Court this morning, on a summons removed from the Magistrate's Court. The plaintiff was the Wellington City Corporation, and the defendants were: Hamilton Gilmer, M.L.C., Allen Maguire, settler; John O'Kane, clerk, Charles Perrin Skerrett K.C., solicitor, and Mary Ami Wardle, settler, all of Wellington. The defendants, it was set out in the statement of claim, are the owners of the Trocadero Private Hotel, upon which a sum of £l3 13s lOd is due for electric heat, light and power supplied. Pursuant to "the provisions of the .Rating Act, 1908, the City Council on Ist June, 1912, demanded this amount, which it was claimed, was recoverable as.a separate rate from the owners of the property. The demand was not complied with, and an action to recover the amount wag therefore brought by the Corporation. The defendants, for whom Sir John Findlay appeared, disputed, the Corporation's right to recbver the amount, and as a separate rate. Sir John Findlay stated that the question for the Court was: Is a Municipal Corporation, which owns or controls' a gas or electric light supply, entitled to recover (under the Rating Act)

from a landlord as a separate rate, the price of gas or electrical energy consumed by a tenant for light, heat, or power, when the tenant had failed to Day Mr O'Shea, City Solicitor, contended that under the Municipal Corporations Act and the Rating Act, the Council possessed the power to enforce this as a separate rate against the landlord, and the amount was recoverable in the same way as other rates Decision was reserved.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19130219.2.23.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXV, Issue 10713, 19 February 1913, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
285

AN INTERESTING CASE Wairarapa Age, Volume XXV, Issue 10713, 19 February 1913, Page 5

AN INTERESTING CASE Wairarapa Age, Volume XXV, Issue 10713, 19 February 1913, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert