Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL REFORM

THE BILL HUNG UP

(By Tekgraph—Press Association.j

WELLINGTON, Lasrt Night.

In the Legislative Council this after- ! noon the debate in the motion for the ■committal of the' Legislative Council Elections 'Bill, and the Hon. J.-D. Ormond's amendment to defer further consideration until next session, was resumed by the Hon. G. Jones, who denied that the Government had a mandate from the people on the subject. He held tho.t time should bo allowed both the people and members • for further consideration of the measure.

The Hon. IVtr Aiu>tey denied that in voting for the second reading ho had affirmed the principle of election. All he had affirmed was that a change was desirable. Ho was opposed to the system proposed in the Bill. No good purpose would be served by allowing the. Bill to passv - •

The Hon. Mr Callan said it was recognised ixs a constitutional principle that the passing of the second reading of a measure endorsed tho- principle contained therein. The Council, to be consistent and maintain its dignity, should continue the consideration of the Bill in Committee.

The Hon. J. Duncan thought the Bill bul better be left alone for this year.

The motion for committal was-lost by 2(F~to 13. The following is the division, list:—Against committal.— Hons. Baillie,George, Rigg, Jenkinson, Jones, Beeban, Gilmer, Johnson, 6rinond, Stevens, Miller, Kelly, Anstev, Harris, Louisson Mills, Duncan, Samuel, Thompson. For committal.— Hons. Bell, Callan, Luke, Paul, Barr, Steward, Parati, Smith, Collins, Loughuan, McLean, McCardle, Wigram. QUESTION IN THE HOUSE. THE GOVERNMENT'S INTENTIONS. WELLINGTON, Last Night. [Replying to a question' by Mr G. W. Russell in the House of Representatives this evening, the Hon. W. F. Massey said that inxill probability the House would be given an opportunity of expressing an opinion on tlie question of whether the reform of the Upper House was necessary. He thought the right thing had been done in giv- ' ing the Council the first opportunity of expressing its opinion on the matter.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19120905.2.20.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10713, 5 September 1912, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
329

LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL REFORM Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10713, 5 September 1912, Page 5

LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL REFORM Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10713, 5 September 1912, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert