Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AN IMPASSIONED APPEAL.

ON BEHALF OF A PRISONER.

Mr T. M. Wilford yesterday made an impassioned appeal for leniency on behalf of the prisoner Edward Reynolds, who had been convicted on the previous day of illegally supplying a certain instrument. The prisoner, counsel said, lived with his .mother at Taita, aaid carried on ibusinefesi in. Wellington. Up to his conviction he had been looked upon as a reputable citizen. The charge was serious, but it would not be loonsidered to be particularly grievous because the other party was escaping altogether. He .pointed out in Reynoldls' favour that he had not gone to the witness box and oomr mitited perjury... There wais not a ibfliaok mark against him in any shape or form. A jury would natturally believe a> girl, who 'Would impress- the m'emibersi more ith'an a man would. No good, lie said, would be done by a 'severe sentence. Prisoner's word ■was trusted, and he .was a generous, kindly man. If his. good character, would not stand him in good stead •now, it never would!: ' His Honour could! punish the prisoner by a fine; Reynolds' ihad gone through! enough already, xor about four months'he had been under the ban. Counsel asked His> Honour to give this man a chance. The mere allegation of the crime would cause Reynolds to be sbnraned, and could he not be helped l rather than put down ? Hda Honour: If possible, I would ihiave been very glad to yield to the eloquent appeal Mr Wilford made on .behalf of the prisoner, but the crime he is convdotedi of is siuch a serious one, and is so regarded by the Legislature, that .it. is my painful duty to impose a term, of imprisonment. A sententea of imprisonment for life is the maximum punishment; that show® wjhat a serious offence it is. Jib is not the oase of a young man, but he is of mature yeans,, and he must hafle engaged' in the comma ssion of the offence very deliberately, and 1 it very nearly resulted in l the death of the girl on whom tihe operation was performed. If she had not had the advantage of surgical aid, it would have resulted in her death. In these cirounxstiances it is my [painfu duty to impose the substantial sentence of five years' imprisonment ■with hlai'd labour. The prisoner, who had 'borne up weß, was visibly affected when-the sentence was pronounced.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19110824.2.32

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10402, 24 August 1911, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
405

AN IMPASSIONED APPEAL. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10402, 24 August 1911, Page 5

AN IMPASSIONED APPEAL. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10402, 24 August 1911, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert