Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MR MASSEY AT AUCKLAND.

- ENTHUSIASTIC RECEPTION.

HE EXPOSES NATIVE LAND TRANSACTIONS.

By Telegraph — Press Association. > AUCKLAND, Last Night, j Mr W, F. Massey, Leader of the i Opposition, addresised a largely-at- j tended meeting in, the Choral Hall , this evening. The .building was ' filled, and a large number of people ■ (estimated at about a thousand), were unable to obtain, admission. Mr Massey, who had an enthusiastic reception, and an excellent hearing, outlined and explained the Opposition platform on the lines of bis Wellington and other speeches. This platform, he declared, was the most Liberal, the most democratic* and the most progressive that had ever been put forward .by any political party in this country. In speaking on the Native land question, he repeated his previous remarks regarding the transaction in respect to the Mokau lands, and went on to say that the firm of lawyers ,who 'acted for the individual who purchased the lands from the Natives was that of Messrs Findlay, Dalziell and Co. (Ohs!) The gemitleiman ,who signed the Order-in-Coun-. oil was Sir James Carroll, ActingPremier, whilst the chairman of the syndicate was an ex-Minister of/ Lands with .strong leasehold tendencies—Mr R. MoNab. ("Oh!") Since •then, he understood the syndicate had been permitted to acquire a further area of some 17,000 acres, making a total of about 70,000 acres. Why was this syndicate permitted to acquire this large area? Why was not a sufficient area reserved for the use of the Natives ? Not a single acre had been. reserved for the (Natives. Why .was not the land isulbmitted it© auction or tender? He intended to press for an inquiry into /why the land was allowed to pass into the possession of a gang of speculators. Sir James Carroll had .said that he (Mr Massey) knew nothing i about Native lands. He thanked God that he did not know as much i ahout ttiese lands as the AotingPrime Minister. Neither he. nor any other member of the Opposition hadj ever trafficked .in Native lands. *'

The following motion, proposed iby Mr E. G. B. Moss, and seconded by Mr J. G. ißutherford, was carried, amidst applause: "That this meeting .of Auckland citiisens thanksMir Massey'heartily i for his' interesting and lucid exposition of the political situation ; congratulates him' upon the aibje and staftesmanjike policy he has ■urafoldied* on behalf of the Opposition party; and wishes him every success in his desire to secure more, economical administration and a genuine reform in the Government of the country." ' An amendment in favour of a/ vote of •thanks only was not seconded.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19110720.2.18.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10291, 20 July 1911, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
428

MR MASSEY AT AUCKLAND. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10291, 20 July 1911, Page 5

MR MASSEY AT AUCKLAND. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10291, 20 July 1911, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert