Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BOY LABOUR.

At a representative meeting of the Balclutha branch of the Farmers' Union, it was unanimously decided to have nothing. ±o do with the Sedgwick or any other scheme of boy immigration. The general opinion was that, tlie farmer ordinarily j had enough to do to provide work j for his own boys, and th?t what was wanted was -. able-bodied the farm, not boy labour. The matter came up on the reading of a. letter from the provincial secretary re the proposed visit of Mr Sedgwick to Otago, wherein it was stated : that lectures would be given between the dates 24th Marcn and the 10th April, and that a visit to Balclutha could be'arranged if desired. Tlie however, \,v was v, /apparently '■■; unanimous in not desiring it. !

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19110329.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10199, 29 March 1911, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
128

BOY LABOUR. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10199, 29 March 1911, Page 4

BOY LABOUR. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10199, 29 March 1911, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert