Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Wairarapa Age MORNING DAILY. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1910. JUDGE SIMS.

! The Labour Party in New Zealand is apparently not enamoured of Judge Sims. It never loses an opportunity of expressing its dissatisfaction at his decisions. It would, of course, be impossible to find a Judge who would please everybody in the matter of Arbitration Court awards. But that is not a consideration with the Labour Unions. They howl at the slightest, provocation. There is no objection to this, provided other people are*'not disturbed. When, however, members of Parliament join in the chorus* as they did in the House of Representatives yesterday afternoon, things, begin to assume a serious aspect. The Arbitration Court, presided over by a Judge, should lie as free from political influence and control as the Supreme Court of the Dominion. Once the findings of a Judge are made the subject of criticism by Parliament, the dignity and power of the Court is imperilled, ft is to be regretted, therefore, that a "tag" to an Auckland award should have been made the excuse for a violent attack upon the President of the Arbitration | Court by 'members of the House of Representatives. It was only the other day that the Prime Minister, from his place in the House, strongly deprecated attacks upon the Judges of the Supreme Court, ana it was painfully suggestive that he should c:i V»VJ.ac: 'ay Lave allowed hi; \

own followers to traverse the decision of Judge Sims without entering a protest. The Arbitration Court may, or may not be a good thing for the Dominion. Its decisions can hardly be expected to give universal satisfaction. But, whilst the Court is in existence, and its operations are governed by statute law, it ill becomes members of the Legislature to traverse its findings. If the Court is not required, by all means wipe it out. So long as it remains a Court, however, it should bo treated with the respect it deserves.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19101110.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10140, 10 November 1910, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
325

Wairarapa Age MORNING DAILY. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1910. JUDGE SIMS. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10140, 10 November 1910, Page 4

Wairarapa Age MORNING DAILY. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1910. JUDGE SIMS. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10140, 10 November 1910, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert