SLY GROG CASES.
(To the Editor). Sir, —I have watched with some interest the re-ent siy trmg cases. and it would appear that for quantity of liquor and the means of disposing j of it there exists considerable immunity. The law seems somewhat j puzzling. In one case at the last sitting it was urged that the defendant, being charged with a second offences for which imprisonment was j provided, had a right to trial by jury. This is not so, as the right to a jury exists only where the term of imprisonment to which defendant is liable exceeds three months, and under the Licensing Act the punishment for a second offence for keeping for sale does not exceed three months. There was, therefore, no right to a jury. Then as to Mrs Neilsen's last fine of £SO. There is absolutely no power to fine instead of imprison in the case of a second offence. I was so struck with- a local in your evening contemporary to the effect that an interesting point had been raised and acted upon, that I have given the matter some attention. The Licensing Act certainly provides imprisonment for n second conviction, but counsel said he has just found a clause in the Justices of the Peace Act, which nevertheless allowed a fine. The Magistrate agreed, but said he was somewhat taken aback and inflicted a fine of £SO. Now the clause in the Justices of the v Peace Act applies to certain offences mentioned in part 5 of that Art, and to no others. In fact, until 1903 part, b was simply a separate Act, "The Indictable Offences Summary Jurisdiction Act, 1894." So that far from being interesting or novel it is entirely inapplicable to the Licensing Act, and has been on our Statutes for actually sixteen years! I also notice that in bis charges Sergeant Miliar was confined to a specific date, lint charges of the nature then in quention are continuing ones, and the New Zealand case of Liston v. Mathews and the English case of R v. Firth show .that charges can be laid for a period extending between two dates. Truly, the lately heard cases are bewildering.—l am, etc., LEX.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19100411.2.18.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10015, 11 April 1910, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
371SLY GROG CASES. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10015, 11 April 1910, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Wairarapa Age. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.