CORRESPONDENCE.
(To the Editor.) Sir,—My attention hag been called to a report in your papar of this morning in the Miller v. Dally, for'infringement of trade mark. You state that Mrs Miller gave evidence which is entirely incorrect; you state what is also incorrect. and that is that the Magistrate did not think there had been a bona fide attempt to infringe the trade mark. The Magistrate found that there was a clear infringement of the trade mark, but that the defendant Dally might have erroneously thought there was a right to use the trade mark on the dissolution of partnership. However, the Magistrate said "he was wrong," But as counsel for Miller Htmly asked for a nominal penalty, fine of 20s and costs was inflicted. —1 am etc., TOBIAS MILLER. Masterton, April 29th, 1907.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19070430.2.24
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Age, Volume XXX, Issue 8412, 30 April 1907, Page 7
Word count
Tapeke kupu
135CORRESPONDENCE. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXX, Issue 8412, 30 April 1907, Page 7
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Wairarapa Age. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in