NEW PLYMOUTH SUPREME COURT.
By Telegraph—Press Association. NEW PLYMOUTH, April 8. At the Supreme Court, to-day, Fred. C. Wilson appealed against an order given to his wife by Mr Hutcheson, S.M., under the provisions of "the Married Persons Summary Separation Act, 1876." The appeal was by way of re-hearing the case. In his evidence regarding his means appellant was examined regarding his statement of accounts when he filed in bankruptcy some time ago, which did not correspond with the present statement. His Honor, in upholding the Magistrate's order, said that appellant Jiad either perverted the truth in the present case or supplied an incorrectjstatement in bankruptcy. An appeal from the decision of the Justices at Inglewood convicting and sentencing to six months' imprisonment a man named Angus, alias Johnstone, alias Steward, on a charge of theft, and ordering him to come before the Supreme Court, to be dealt with as an habitual criminal, was heard. After argument His Honor sustained the conviction, but quashed the order regarding the dealing of accused as an habitual criminal.
CABLE NEWS.
By Telegraph—Press Association—Copyright
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19070409.2.12.17
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Age, Volume XXIX, Issue 8392, 9 April 1907, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
180NEW PLYMOUTH SUPREME COURT. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXIX, Issue 8392, 9 April 1907, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Wairarapa Age. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in