Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION COURT.

DUNEDIN, February 7. At to-day's sittings of the Arbitration Court, Mr Belcher continued his address. He said the preference of employment clause had given rise to more controversy than any other clause in the award. The Seamen's Union, ever since the Arbitration Act had been in existence, had been contending for the principle of preference of employment of its members. The Court had not thought fit to grant that to seamen, although there had never been any substantial reason advanced by the Court for not granting the request. The Seamen's Union had 95 per cent, of the men employed in their union and no other organisation could say it had 95 per,, cent, of workers in their particular trade in their union.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19060208.2.17.3

Bibliographic details

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXVIII, Issue 7958, 8 February 1906, Page 5

Word Count
124

ARBITRATION COURT. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXVIII, Issue 7958, 8 February 1906, Page 5

ARBITRATION COURT. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXVIII, Issue 7958, 8 February 1906, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert