RESIDENT-MAGISTRATE'S COURT, LAWRENCE.
Monday, 22nd February. (Before E. H. Carew, Esq., R.M.)
"Police v. W. I). Motrison. — His Worship said he had no doubt defendant was - liable ; as, however, he thought, on looking over the evidence, that Mr. Morrison 1 had intended to comply with the law, and that the fault was that of those under him, he wonld only inflict a nominal penalty. Fined Is., and costs of court, Bs. Mr. Thompson asked for the expenses of the Town Clerk, who was examined as a witness. His Worship did not allow these, as the witness was only ( detained for a short time.
Cox v. Isaac Long. — Claim of £1 9s. for goods supplied. There was no appearance of the defendant. Judgment for £1 9s. and costs of Court, 9s. Herbert vmd Anotlier v. William Henderson. — Claim of £35 6s. Id. on an acceptance, which was matured but unpaid. Judgment for the amount claimed, and costs of Court, 265. 1 >AUken v. William Henderson. — Claim of £11 17s 9d. on a promissory note. Judgment for the amount claimed, and costs of Court, 20s.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TT18750227.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Tuapeka Times, Volume VIII, Issue 438, 27 February 1875, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
183RESIDENT-MAGISTRATE'S COURT, LAWRENCE. Tuapeka Times, Volume VIII, Issue 438, 27 February 1875, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in