Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DISTRICT COURT, LAWRENCE.

(Before his Honor, Judge Gray.) IN BANKRUPTCY. Charles Nicholson, of Ettrick, licensed victuallers, made application for his order of discbarge. Mr. M'Coy appeared for tlie bankrupt. Order granted. Hugh. Irwin, of Tuapeka, laborer, applied for his order of discharge. Mr. M'Coy appeared for the bankrupt. Mr. Anderson, an opposing creditor, and the trustee, examined the bankrupt ; after which the matter was postponed for two months. CIVIL CASES. Henry v. Xancaster. — Claim of £200 for breach of an agreement by defendant to let his farm to the plaintiff. Mr. M'Coy appeared for the plaintiff ; Mr. Taylor for the defendant. The plaint set out that the plaintiff is a runholder in the Tuapeka district, and for the profitable carrying on of his business as a sheep farmer, required a fattening farm, easy of access ; that the defendant had the only suitable farm for the purposes of the plaintiff, and that, in addition, it commanded a ready market for stock ; that the defendant agreed to let the said farm to the plaintiff, but neglected and refused to carry out the said agreement, whereby the plaintiff lost the profits he would have made, &c. The defence filed was — firstly, a denial of the agreement; secondly, of tho breach of it ; thirdly, that no lease had been tendered by tho plaintiff to the defendant for execution; and lastly, the Statute of Frauds. Th« agreement was contained in a letter written by Lancaster to Henry offering him the farm for five years at a rental of £250, delivery to be taken before the 30th June, 1874. The case was fully argued, and occupied the court up to a late hour for two days. The case finally 1 narrowed itself down to the following material point : Did the defendant withdraw his offer before acceptance, Or not? Both Mes3rs. Cotton and Henry averred that they left Waipori immediately on gettiag the letter, to take delivery, and accepted the offer the moment they saw Lancaster. Lancaster, on the other hand, swore that the first thing he said to them was, " You are too late, boys; the place is under offer." His Honor thought that the offer had been "withdrawn before acceptance, and accordingly gave judgment for the defendant, with professional costs, £10. His Honor complimented the counsel on both sides for the way they had handled the case. Be the Havilah Hill Gold Mining and Sluicing Company, Registered. — Mr. Taylor, instructed by Mr. Gooday, moved that the appointment of Mr. Capstick, junr., as liquidator, be confirmed. His Honor declined to make the order until he had more full information before him. The matter was post* poned for two months.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TT18741118.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Tuapeka Times, Volume VII, Issue 409, 18 November 1874, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
443

DISTRICT COURT, LAWRENCE. Tuapeka Times, Volume VII, Issue 409, 18 November 1874, Page 2

DISTRICT COURT, LAWRENCE. Tuapeka Times, Volume VII, Issue 409, 18 November 1874, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert