Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHAT NEXT !

At a recent meeting of the Richmond Select Vestry, Mr. S. T. Gascoyne 9aid he had heard it stated that the Vicar of Richmond, the Rev. C. T. Procter, intended to have a wall built between the consecrated and nnconsecrated portions of the new cemetery. Thinking that such a proposal in the nineteenth century was an insult to the parishoners, he moved — " That the vestry is of opinion that no wall or distinctive mark beyond a path should be allowed between the Conformist and Nonconformist portions of the burialground." The motion was carried by a majority. After the passing of this resolution, the wall was completed. On Wednesday a public meeting was held - Mr. J. Thompson, a Churchman, in the chair — for the purpose of protesting against the conduct of the parties who had erected the wall. The following letter was read from Earl Russell : — " Pembroke Lodge Richmond Park, March 30, 1874. "Sir, — I am extremely grieved to learn that the very reasonable and proper arrangement of the land granted in 1863, by separating the consecrated and unconsecrated ground by a simple footpath, has not been followed in the land recently given as an addition to the cemetery. It should be understood that Dissenters are not merely tolerated by the law of this land. Protestuats, recognised by the Toleration Act, as it i 3 called, have the right by law, on tho payment of a small fee, to erect a building for divine worship according to their own faith and their own ceremonies, and the magistrates have no other function than to recognise this right I am therefore surprised to hear that the Vicar has erected and finished a wall placed between the Conformists and Nonconformists' portions of the burial ground. The obvious effect of this wall being bnilt will be to drive away peace aud goodwill between the Christiana who conform to the Church, and the Christians who are Nonconformists. As I cannot suppose that such is the design of Mr. Procter, I trust that either he will give directions that the wall should be pulled down, or that the bishop of the diocese will point out to- him that the object of Christ's coining upon earth was not to destroy peaco and goodwill, but to inspire them. - 1 remain, with much regard, your faithful servant. " Russell." "Chas. Burt, Esq.,*- " Friar Stile Lodge Richmond.'* A resolution was passed declaring the erection of the wall highly objectionable.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TT18740826.2.14

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Tuapeka Times, Volume VII, Issue 385, 26 August 1874, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
409

WHAT NEXT ! Tuapeka Times, Volume VII, Issue 385, 26 August 1874, Page 3

WHAT NEXT ! Tuapeka Times, Volume VII, Issue 385, 26 August 1874, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert