Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. LAWRENCE.

(Before E. H. Carew, Esq., E.M.) Friday, January 30th. Police v. John Wilson alias Barney. This case had been remanded from last Tuesday. Inspector Thompson appeared for the police ; Mr. M'Coy for the prisoner. Mr. M'Coy stated that on the last day on which he appeared for the prisoner, he knew nothing of the facts, having only heard that the prisoner required his services a short time before the Court opened, and when he was occupied in attending to another matter. He had seen the prisoner since, and he would a9k the Court to allow him (the prisoner) to plead " guilty " to the charge, and deal with it in a summary manner. His Worship having called some evidence and elicited that the' value of the property stolen was under £10, acquiesced with the report of prisoner's counsel. After the usual caution had been read to him (the prisoner) he pleaded guilty. Mr. M'Coy then addressed the Court in mitigation of punishment. He adverted to the carelessness with which the money had been kept. The prisoner had access to the room, and had been allowed to see the money in the box.. The chance of detection seemed small anl this temptation had been thrown in his 'vray when his mind was debased and unhinged by several weeks of hard drinking ; under those circumstances ho might do that which, under others, he would feel very much ashamed to do. He was not even sober at the time. This of course was no excuse in law, but might have some effect on the punishment to be inflicted. The prisoner on coming to his senses confessed his guilt. Counsel did not know what the antecedents of the prisoner were, if good so much the better, if otherwise there was the evidence even of his accuser, Mr. Roberts, that for the last three years or so that he had known him, he had the reputation of boing an industrious and honest roan. The Court had the power of sentencing him to twelve months hard labour, but for the reasons mentioned he would ask his Worship not to inflict the full punishment. His Worship said that some of the considerations urged by Mr. M'Coy in the prisoner's favour had much weight with him. and as he had pleaded guilty he thought a short punisliment Trould suffice ; sentenced to three month's imprisonment with hard labour in Lawrence Gaol. Ah Tony v. Ah Buck.. No appearance; case struck out.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TT18740204.2.17

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Tuapeka Times, Volume VI, Issue 327, 4 February 1874, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
415

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. LAWRENCE. Tuapeka Times, Volume VI, Issue 327, 4 February 1874, Page 3

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. LAWRENCE. Tuapeka Times, Volume VI, Issue 327, 4 February 1874, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert