Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE COURTS.

RESIDENT MAGISTRATES' COURT, LAWRENCE. (Before K. H. Carew, Esq., R.M.) Friday, 4th July. James Hopkins v. John North. — Mr. Mouat for plaintiff ; Mr. M'Coy for the defendant. This was action brought to recover from the defendant the sum of £4, being part valua of a horse at one time the property of defendant and one Henry Balliston, then working as mates, and sold by them to Hopkins for the sum of £8, on the consideration that they should have the horse an repaying the purchase money to Hopkins. Thoy got the horse back again, and promised to pay as soon as possible. They paid a small portion in cash, and on various occasions sent pork to the plaintiff for sale, leaving a balance of £4. The action was brought to recover that amount. The case was gone into at some length, in which hard swearing was a prominent feature. His Worship commented upon its too frequent occurrence in this Court, and eventually gave a verdict for the defendant. John M'Gomb v. Robert Grieve. — Mr. M'Coy for plaintiff; Air. Mouat for defendant. This action was brought to decide the ownership of a small house situated on the Blue Spur, at one timo occupied by Mr. Gill lerfc Ralston, and sold by him to the plaintiff for £'8. M'Comb afterwards spent some £18 on improvements. A brother-in-law of his (M' Douall) then became his tenant, and, according to plaintiffs evidence, paid him a certain sum for board and lodgings. M'Douall was afterwards employed in tho Perseverance claim, and got into debt with defendant, who allowed him credit on the understanding that the house he was living in was his own property. He was confirmed in this belief, as on one occasion he advanced £10 to M'Douall to pay M'Comb the balance owing on the house. But tiio plaintiff states that the money, instead of part payment for the property, was to reimbmse him for board and lodging. Evidence was heard on both sides, plaintiff and,defendant coming in for a severe cross-examination. His Worship reserved judgment until next Court day.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TT18730710.2.38

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Tuapeka Times, Volume VI, Issue 284, 10 July 1873, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
349

THE COURTS. Tuapeka Times, Volume VI, Issue 284, 10 July 1873, Page 9

THE COURTS. Tuapeka Times, Volume VI, Issue 284, 10 July 1873, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert