WARDEN'S COURT, WAITAHUNA.
(Before W. L. Simpson, Esq., Warden.) Frida.t, Novembeb 3rd.
Langley and others v. Birch. — This was a complaint, under the lxi. section of the G-olafields Act, 1866, that the complainants and defendant could not agree, and that the defendant would not pay bis share of the working expenses of the claim. Mr. G-ooday for plaintiffs ; Mr. M'Coy for defendant. After some evidence had been taken, it transpired, to|the surprise of both counsel, that Birch had actually sold his interest. After some consultation, the case waß settled, on the understanding that the defendant was io pay his share of the expenses incurred.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TT18711109.2.17
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 197, 9 November 1871, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
104WARDEN'S COURT, WAITAHUNA. Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 197, 9 November 1871, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in