Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FEMALE BEAUTY.— AUCKLAND V TARANAKI.

The champion of the Auckland ladies writes as follows iv reply to the letter of "Honour Where Honour i,« Due," in last week's Observer: Dear Mr Editor, — Though I do not care to continue an argument with. a. writer who descends to vulgar personalities, I think her (or his) last epistle calls for some answer. The only point I yare to devote any special attention to is that in which my opponent throws off the mask in the following sentence : "She (that is myself) has not sufficient mental acumen to perceive the glaringly evident fact that the letter she objects to was written by one of the sterner sex. and not by a lady." There is nothing like making a clean breast of it. On his own showing, my opponent is an imposter and a cheat, and his word is worthless. Probably he would not stop short at forgery if anything were to be made by it. But after all, sir, I ought not to be blamed for mistaking him for an old woman. I judged him by his style. And then to think of a man, much less a gentleman, who would so far forget himself as to heap ridicule and abuse on the ladies of Auckland, into whose company such a boor as ' Honour to Whom Honour is Due ' is not fit to be received.

It is lucky for him that his identity is not known to some of their big brothers. For the information of the anonymous maligner of Auckland's ladies, let me say that Sir George Bowen was not the first to call Auckland ' the Corinth of the South.' He merely borrowed the phrase from a pioneer colonist who came here a generation before him. Was it not Governor Hobson, Mr Editor ? Anyway, it was first used by one who was perfectly competent to judge of the respective claims of Auckland and Taranaki to the palm of beauty. In conclusion, I think we Auckland girls can very well dispeuse with the gratuitous and impertinent advice at the end of the letter of ' Honour Where Honour is Due,' who seems to possess no honour at all."

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TO18850328.2.4.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Observer, Volume 7, Issue 237, 28 March 1885, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
364

FEMALE BEAUTY.—AUCKLAND V TARANAKI. Observer, Volume 7, Issue 237, 28 March 1885, Page 3

FEMALE BEAUTY.—AUCKLAND V TARANAKI. Observer, Volume 7, Issue 237, 28 March 1885, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert