RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT
THIS DAY.
(Before H. Kenrick, Esq., E.M.) CIVIL SIDE. Townsend v. Emmett.—Claim, £3 7s 9d for goods sold. Judgment for amount and costs, 7s. McCaul v. Buck.—Claim £7 19*, goods sold. Judgment for amount and costs. Judgement Summons. Donnelly v. Dillon.—The paintiff sued for the half of a judgment obtained against him and the defendant by Mr H. E. Campbell, which Donnelly had to pay and for which he obtained a judgment against Dillon. The defendant had finished a contract for fencing the hot springs at Te Aroha, and has always been in work, he was in a position to pay the amount recovered. An application had been made by Dillon to have his cvi« dence taken at Te Aroha, and the case was adjourned until the 31st August to enable this to be d O n e . '
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18830810.2.15
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume XIV, Issue 4555, 10 August 1883, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
141RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Thames Star, Volume XIV, Issue 4555, 10 August 1883, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in