WARDEN'S COURT.
THIS DAT.
(Before H. Kenrick, Esq., Warden.) MINING INSPECTOB V. H.'Ci WICK. This case brd bf en previously ret down for he.'ring, but had been rdjournrd to allow the defendant to apply to the Government for a remission of rept, which "ie had done, but jino reply had been received (o bis application. Ije case was ' urther rdjourned. , MINING INSPECTOE V. W. AND A. TAYLOR. For a romplaiDt of non^-registration of the Alma Claim. One of the defendant* stated tbat after ten days work be found the ground was not sufficiently good, so he abandoned it. Did not tbink it ne-ev ! saiy fo regis er. The Mining Insf. ctor withdrew the crse. The came defendapt was also compla'nd zgainst for non-registration of the D"eamClaim. This was also withdrawn. MININ& IKSPCETOB V. JOHN MCWILLIAMB. A complaint of ton registration of tie Katipo claim. The defendant bf d b - n summoned before* in a . irailar c;»se, t?<o bench said it must icfl:ct the penalty of £1 and costs 13s. MINING INSPECTOE V. W. D. HOBINSON. For non registration, there was no appearance of the defendant. The Mining Registrar said the claim had been abaudoced, and he would consequently withdraw tbe plaint. MINING INSPXCTOB V. ABHEE CA33EELLS. Non-registration of tbe Sunbeam claim at Owbaroa. The defendant wrote slating that he bad abandoned tbe claim, hu would have register. J it bat for a?i accident he had met with.' Fin 1 £1 and costs 13s. THOMAS MCDONOUGH V. JOHN MCWIL* LIAMS. The applicant desived to be put ia pos~ session of tbe' Katipo claim at Karaogahake, on the ground hat the claim was insufficient y work d, jy Se de.'endaat. The plaintiff said he had breh oa the ground since the 18th December. It had not been wprked since the 7th February. | Ths defendant bed no interest in the application ; he was alone in the master. J. Me Williams, the defendant, said he had worked the claim up (o the 7th of this mouth; had only one n?an working with him on six men's ground. He still wished to hold the grouad. Hed another claim at Kar&agahake called the Crown Prince. The Bench made every allowance for a man holding a large area o? g*ou:)d at a place like'Karaugahake, where they had no battery and bad ra.cds, but the defendant was Irequently before the Court, pnd he had here pegged out 30 acres and kept it locked up. He would grant the application, with cost 3.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18830222.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume XIV, Issue 4411, 22 February 1883, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
414WARDEN'S COURT. Thames Star, Volume XIV, Issue 4411, 22 February 1883, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.