Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WARDEN'S COURT.

THIS DAT.

(Before H. Kenrick, Esq., Warden.) MINING INSPECTOB V. H.'Ci WICK. This case brd bf en previously ret down for he.'ring, but had been rdjournrd to allow the defendant to apply to the Government for a remission of rept, which "ie had done, but jino reply had been received (o bis application. Ije case was ' urther rdjourned. , MINING INSPECTOE V. W. AND A. TAYLOR. For a romplaiDt of non^-registration of the Alma Claim. One of the defendant* stated tbat after ten days work be found the ground was not sufficiently good, so he abandoned it. Did not tbink it ne-ev ! saiy fo regis er. The Mining Insf. ctor withdrew the crse. The came defendapt was also compla'nd zgainst for non-registration of the D"eamClaim. This was also withdrawn. MININ& IKSPCETOB V. JOHN MCWILLIAMB. A complaint of ton registration of tie Katipo claim. The defendant bf d b - n summoned before* in a . irailar c;»se, t?<o bench said it must icfl:ct the penalty of £1 and costs 13s. MINING INSPECTOE V. W. D. HOBINSON. For non registration, there was no appearance of the defendant. The Mining Registrar said the claim had been abaudoced, and he would consequently withdraw tbe plaint. MINING INSPXCTOB V. ABHEE CA33EELLS. Non-registration of tbe Sunbeam claim at Owbaroa. The defendant wrote slating that he bad abandoned tbe claim, hu would have register. J it bat for a?i accident he had met with.' Fin 1 £1 and costs 13s. THOMAS MCDONOUGH V. JOHN MCWIL* LIAMS. The applicant desived to be put ia pos~ session of tbe' Katipo claim at Karaogahake, on the ground hat the claim was insufficient y work d, jy Se de.'endaat. The plaintiff said he had breh oa the ground since the 18th December. It had not been wprked since the 7th February. | Ths defendant bed no interest in the application ; he was alone in the master. J. Me Williams, the defendant, said he had worked the claim up (o the 7th of this mouth; had only one n?an working with him on six men's ground. He still wished to hold the grouad. Hed another claim at Kar&agahake called the Crown Prince. The Bench made every allowance for a man holding a large area o? g*ou:)d at a place like'Karaugahake, where they had no battery and bad ra.cds, but the defendant was Irequently before the Court, pnd he had here pegged out 30 acres and kept it locked up. He would grant the application, with cost 3.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18830222.2.14

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume XIV, Issue 4411, 22 February 1883, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
414

WARDEN'S COURT. Thames Star, Volume XIV, Issue 4411, 22 February 1883, Page 2

WARDEN'S COURT. Thames Star, Volume XIV, Issue 4411, 22 February 1883, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert