BESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT

Thames Star, Volume XII, Issue 3856, 9 May 1881, Page 2

BESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT

THIS DAY. (Before H. Kenrick, Esq., n.U.) Claim, £20 *«"4d, for goods deliTeredf Mr Miller for plamfcitt. Mr Renshaw, who P™Ted the debt, deposed that .some .little time ago Mr Kelly called a meeting of his creditors, and laid before them a statement of his affairs, which showed bis assets to.be; £1300, and his debts £900. that meeting he agreed to d T O!^ feß^! m toeadministered by Mr John Kead and himself, but since that meeting he had re • fused to sign the deed of assignment, and Jiad disposed of a quantity ofMs goods. judgment was given for the amount claimed with costs. Mr Miller asked for immediate execution, which was granted. W. CULPITT V. B. KELLY. Claim, £36 7s. Mr Miller for plaintiff. The evidence iv this case was similar to the preceding one, and judgment was, given for the amount claimed, with costs, •nd immediate execution. JOHN BEAD V. B. KBLLY. Claim, £68 Is 9d. Mr Miller for plaintiff. Itf this case plaintiff ha£ agreed to reduce the claim to £50, so as to bring it wUhip the jurisdiction of ibis Court. Mr He»i proved the debt, and judgment was giyeu for £50 and costs, immediate execution also being granted.

GEOBGE TQA^ J, E. J^ELLY. : CUim for £18^irages due. , Mr Miller for piaiptiff. The evidence Ijtere was also similar to that in the preceding cases. .Judgment was given for tbe amouot claimed with costs, £1 4s, immediate execution also being granted. . • •