WARDEN'S COURT.
THIS DAY.
(Before H. Kenrick, Esq., Warden.)
EOMTJS T. SULLIVAN
In this case the judgment of the Court was reserved from last Court day. His Worship said this was a claim for forfeiture of a claim called the Land League, on the ground of non-working. His Worship said he was inclined to agree with Mr Cuff that it was not the intention of the Act to allow one mau to have two licensed holdings without amalgamation.
Mr Cuff contended that the application was null and void.
Mr Miller said that if the argument of Mr Cuff was rigat every application would be null and void if the applicants encroached on another claim.
His Worship heldf that the application was bad as a matter of fact. The claim called the Land League would be forfeited on the ground of non-working. Mr Miller made an application that the forfeiture of the claim be altered to a fine. Mr Cuff objected to the application. His Worship inflicted a fine of 5s and costs. Mr Cuff gave notice of appeal. PATBICK JJQNNELLY T. CHARLES TONGPS. Mr Miller appealed for the defendant, and applied for an adjournment on account of the defendant being at Te Aroha. Mr Campbell objected to the adjournment. The Court adjourned the case. Court adjourned.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18810209.2.12
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume XII, Issue 3781, 9 February 1881, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
216WARDEN'S COURT. Thames Star, Volume XII, Issue 3781, 9 February 1881, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in