DISTRICT COURT.
THIS DAY.
(Before J. E. McDonald, Esq.,* District Judge.) Judgments fob Plaintiffs. buchanan v. tiniuha. Claim, £72 16s 2d, on a promissory note. Mr Miller appeared for the plain- ■ tiff. Judgment for amount claimed with costs. TIZABD V. BIBN. Claim, £59 12s 2d. Mr Brassey for the plaintiff. Judgment for plaintiff with costs.. ■ Adjoubmed Case. DABUNa V. EMMA TE AOTTEtT. la this case Mr Miller appeared for the plaintiff, and asked for an adjournment in consequence of the defence not having been submitted according to the District Court rule—within seven days of the date of hearing.
Mr Dodd defended.
The case was adjourned—defendant to pay costs £12 7s.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18810201.2.11
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume XII, Issue 3774, 1 February 1881, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
110DISTRICT COURT. Thames Star, Volume XII, Issue 3774, 1 February 1881, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in