Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DUNEDIN.

Yesterday

A coroner's inquest on the bodies of Attiwell and Amelia Emma Hayes was held to day. The evidence was corroborative of circumstances previously given, and the verdict was that deceased had killed his wife and then committed suicide while in a fit of temporary insanity.

A case of interest to new arrivals and others in search of employment was heard this morning at the R.M. Court. It was William Laughlan v. Armstrong and Fattinson, damages £10, for false representation. The defendants are labor agents, and plaintiff's evidence was that in January he applied to them for a situation when defendant gave him a sealed letter addressed to one Millis, storekeeper near Gore. Witness asked to see the letter, but they said it was private, but that it was sending him to a billet at 30s a week in a store. Witness went to Gore, but when he went he found Millis was not there, his store being shut up and the business sold off. The people at Gore told him. that Millis did not require a man at all, that the place was shut, that seven or eight people had already been sent down from Dunedia by the defendants on a similar errand. Witness on arriving at Gore had to walk 20 miles to Millis' place and back again, he had paid 33a for railway fare, and had been put to an expense for living, and had lost a fortnight of his time, during which he might have got a billet elsewhere.

The defendants denied the plaintiff's story, stating that tbey had sent the plaintiff to Millis because the latter had shortly before instructed them to send eighteen men to his place to work on a station! The U.M., however, considered that plaintiff's case was proved, and that defendant did make false representations. He assessed damages at £5.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18800210.2.7.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3472, 10 February 1880, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
310

DUNEDIN. Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3472, 10 February 1880, Page 2

DUNEDIN. Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3472, 10 February 1880, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert