Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Evening Sitting.

The House feassemblrd at 7.30. SUPPLIES OBANTEJ).

The Houge. went into Committee of Supply and an Imprest Supply Bill of £800,000 was passed through all its stages. DEBATE EESU3ISD. The debate, interrupted by the adjournment was continued by Sir George Grey. He blamed three of the Auckland members for having hidden their designs from him. The member for Marsden however vh«d acted more straightforwardly. He had the courage to come to him aud tell him that as he had retired from the leadership he now felt he was at liberty to rote as he thought proper. He (Sir George) concurred in the hon. member's opinion. However sad he might be at what had taken place he was still sanguine that the right would triumph, and that the majority on the side of Liberalism would soon be largely augmented, notwithstanding what had transpired.

Mr Reid spoke on the part of the Opposition, and Mr Wakefield on the part of the Government.

Mr DeLatnour . blamed the Auckland members for not having gone to the party and intimated their intentions of leaving them. It was said this defection had taken place in the interests of Auckland. Ho would not believe tbat the interests of Auckland demanded the sacrifice of the personal honor of its representatives. He maintained that the Government by party was indispensibie, and he deeply deplored this unfortunate exhibition of the light esteem placed upon its ties.

Tawhia said (hat this Government had abused Sir G. Grey,, but they bad taken, all his ideas. .The Auckland members believed iv Sir G. Grey, and what they objected to was he had handed over the Premiership to Mr Mecandretr. The great fault they hud to find with the Government was that it had not made sufficient provision tor native affairs, and it was wrong to talk about abolishing the Native .Department. Mr Hislop insisted that although the. Government had asserted tbat there was no correspondence passing between them and the Auckland members, he was creditably informed that there had been such a correspondence. At 12.30 a.m. the debate had not been concluded.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18791025.2.14

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3383, 25 October 1879, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
351

Evening Sitting. Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3383, 25 October 1879, Page 2

Evening Sitting. Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3383, 25 October 1879, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert