Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT

.>■■.>,::. this day; y---r (Before, J, Kilgqttk and E. ft. Puckey, . Esqs.,Jf.'sP.) : ■' A DOG WITHOUT A .TICKET. Albert Bruce was charged with that he/being the owrierbf a dog, " did unlawfully allow the same to be at large in Albert street,.' Grahamstown, without a ticket for the ensuing year being affixed thereto. . Defendant pleaded guilty, but stated that he had a collar for the year for the dog; -Mr Bullen said he did not dispute Mr Bruce's having a collar, but the offence was complete by. permitting it.; to go at large. : '„ ■' ~ ' Pined 5s and costs. '•■ •■■;■ ANOTHER TTimCKETED DOG. . Owen Griffiths was charged with that he, being the owner of a dog, did unlawfully allow the same to be at large in Queen Grahamstown, without a ticket for the ensuing year being affixed thereto.; ; ■ ;r --: '/• .■; ,'•: .! ■■. )':_■ . • ; Defendant pleaded guilty, and was fined 5s and costs. SInUIGHTEBING A PIG. . Darnel Orme was charged with having unlawfully slaughtered a pig within the town of Grahamstown, on tha 25feh inst. ;^ Defendant pleaded guilty, but said the circumstances were peculiar. Ho bad a horse and a pig in; the yard, and the horse kicked the pig, breaking it» back, so that he had to kill it. | Mr Bullen said if Mr Orme could give satisfactory proof of- his statement it would be quite sufficient to exbnerate him. Defendant said his wife saw the accident. The pig was a young thing weighing about 3Olbs. It got, into the stable where the horse was. He, had not brought j bis wife, not thinking it necessary. - . Defendant was put into the box, and made the above statement on oath. [ The Bench wei'e satisfied with the explanation, and dismissed the case. ■ Tho Court then adjourned. ..

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18750701.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 2025, 1 July 1875, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
287

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 2025, 1 July 1875, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 2025, 1 July 1875, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert