Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WERE SECRETS DIVULGED?

Foreign Office Confidential

Memorandum.

QUESTIONS IN HOUSE OF COMMONS.

By Cable —Press Association —Copyright. Australian and N.Z. Cable Association Received May 12, 8.5 p.m. LONDON, May 11.

In the House of Commons, replying to Mr Ramsay Macdonald, who put a question regarding the publication by the “New York World” of an alleged secret memorandum which it asserted Mr Chamberlain presented to Cabinet in February, urging a new Anglo-Franco-Belgiau Entente, the revision of. the Silesian agreement and Polish corridor, as an essential condition to British security, Mr Chamberlain said the memorandum appeared to be a copy of a document of which another American newspaper gave’ an account some two months ago. It was not in tho public interest to give information in regard to the Foreign Office, for his own use or for confidential communication to his colleagues here, or to other Governments of tho Empire. He added that the policy of the Government was explained by him in the House of Commons on March 24, and this was unchanged. Mr Macdonald asked whether the published document was inaccurate. Mr Chamberlain deprecated calling on the Government to explain whether what purported to be a confidential document, which, if it were such, must have been improperly obtained, was accurate or not, but any statement of the Government policy, which contradicted his statement of March 24th, had no authority whatever.

Mr Lansbury asked if such a leakage of confidential documents was customary in the Foreign Office, because it was the second time within a few months it had happened, the Zinovieff letter being the first. Was Mr Chamberlain satisfied of the good faith of the men in his department. Mr Chamberlain replied that ‘‘undoubtedly he was sorry that any aspersion had even been suggested against them.”

Replying to Commander Kenworthy, Mr Chamberlain said this document was not circulated by the Foreign Office. He was not aware of any document being circulated to the Conservative newspapers..

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THD19250513.2.39

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Timaru Herald, Volume XCVIII, 13 May 1925, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
325

WERE SECRETS DIVULGED? Timaru Herald, Volume XCVIII, 13 May 1925, Page 9

WERE SECRETS DIVULGED? Timaru Herald, Volume XCVIII, 13 May 1925, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert